• By -


Even psychopaths find this disturbing.


Depends on the kind of rice.


Who the FUCK gave this the WHOLESOME award?


Hannibal Lecter got his internet privileges back.


He'd want the baby with a nice Chianti and some Fava beans... ![gif](giphy|VvTG9RrCeGrza)


Oh ok makes sense


People with no souls


the fuck


No, the rice


now thats enough


Long grain rice wouldn’t be fitting


I’m going to hell for laughing out loud reading your comment.


I'm only laughing to keep from crying


I’ve said that like twice this week already and more times than I want to count over the last couple of years. If everything could just chill for 5 minutes, that would be great.


That's because you're imagining a nice coconut basmati or fragrant jasmine jeera, both being a great choice.




Probably Uncle Ben’s to reduce contam


New strain incoming!






This is the perfect Reddit comment. I wish there was an award for “HAHA YOU ARE SO REDDIT!”


Am a psychopath can confirm.


I’m a psychopath and I approve of this message ‘brought to you by psychopaths against ISIS’


https://www.jammukashmirnow.com/Encyc/2020/1/18/Killing-of-Telecom-Engineer-BK-Ganjoo-on-22nd-March-1990-by-terrorists-and-those-who-called-themselves-his-neighbours.html The ideology makes them do these things everywhere they go. There is no reasoning with such people.


“Human beings are the only creatures on earth that claim a God and the only thing that behaves like it hasn’t got one.” — Hunter S. Thompson


"Do you think God stays in heaven because he, too, lives in fear of what he's created here on earth?" - Steve Buscemi


I mean just nuke us at this point


“Us”!? WTF did I do?


Well whatever got you banned I guess


I could tell you, but ……


Go on......


Well. It all started with a video showing a middle school student verbally assaulting his teacher…….


careful, you could get banned talking like that... I'm pretty sure mentioning a gender with anything related to school is a crime now.


You're godamn right


Hahah awesome


I’m rooting for the plague


r/NoahGetTheBoat exists for a reason...


More like Noah get to the nuclear bomb shelter


Lol spy kids 2... i remember that hit me out of no where


Honey badgers behave like they have no god


They don't have one


Unless it's the god from Silent Hill 3 or smth


They are Gods!! They don't give no shit!!


I did say that.


Idk, Chimps are pretty psychotic creatures. They're cannibalistic, murdering, have eaten faces off of people, they politic.


Virgin chimp vs Chad Bonobo


Difference is it's purely primal instinct. They don't rip peoples faces off for fun.


If it's primal instinct why do they rarely kill members of their own communities but have zero issue reeking havoc amongst foreign chimps?? They are far more advanced then you are giving them credit for, chimps are sentient and don't act on "primal" desires.


It isn’t primal instinct it’s premeditated, that’s like saying you can’t blame a human for a crime cause it was primal instinct. Animals have a the intelligence to know what they are doing


Will never understand how people will do cruel things then expect their god to accept them. If that were allowed then we as a race have failed and shouldn’t be alive.


I've heard that if you just tell yourself the other person isn't human it makes it real easy for them


Countless horrible groups throughout history have done that shit to justify genocide


Apparently you can write anything into a god, so if you write in cruelty, then it all jibes with the god thing. What this proves is that nonviolence comes before god, before ideology.


Just more proof that god is fiction, the concept is completely man-made for greed and power.




Easier to believe when you read the holy books


Read into the religion, their interpretation requires this approach


I wonder how many of the people who downvoted you would have upvoted if the context was a Republican Christian.


cannibalism is haram in all school of Islamic thought


Haram for themselves, but what about making others?


Read into the religion but you don’t know that forcing someone to commit a sin doesn’t make them bear it?


Are you really defending ISIS? Lmfao anything for the sake of internet arguments I guess A military founded on the principle of radicalized religion will not act in a way that they believe goes against their god. And if they do, new language will be added to make room for it. How do you think people have been rationalizing religious atrocities for centuries? Hint - they think they’re the good guys, just as we all do


Bro, you said the quiet part out loud


It’s 8:14 am. And that’s enough Reddit for today


Almost same thing happened in Kashmir, India. Wife was made to eat husband's blood soaked rice.


That movie scene and the last scene was to most horrific things i have ever seen.


How about the bloody oatmeal in *Golden Child*?


I want the knife..........please......


That's a blast from the past... 🫣


Also the "Sainbari Murder" incident in which members of the CPIM( Communist party of India) forced a mother to eat rice soaked with her son's blood.


You can't talk about Muslim atrocities, it is Islamophobic


Nah mate, thats just you. The rest of us have no problem talking about it.


He's being ironic I assume.


Yeah but it sounds like some right wing “can’t say anything these days” bs from a snowflake that wants to be a victim


try to critique islam where people arent on the same page, youll get mauled...


And it's because of people like you that these people are so prolific in their hatred.


He is being ironic.


Too many people god honest believe this for me to take as anything but completely serious. However after looking at his post history, he is completely serious.


I'm not a fan of religious dogma, but pretty sure feeding mother her child is not in the Quran.


I'm pretty fucking sure that shit is very very haram


Correction: YOU can’t talk about Islamic extremist* atrocities without being islamophobic. Some of us can.


What about islamic non-extremist atrocities?


Obviously they don't exist /s


I mean, I'd argue that any that commit atrocities can be considered extremists. It's like saying "what about murders commited my non-murderers"


I would refer to Isreal for a good starting point. Some of the folks being forced from thier home, cruelty by police, denied freedom of religion or to mourn at funerals... I wouldn't consider myself an extremist of any religion ideologyor belief .... i could not say i am sure what I would do and to whom if I had to walk a mile in those shoes.


>You can't talk about Muslim atrocities, it is Islamophobic Yes you can, you can even do it without being Islamophobic. Source: most of the comments in this thread.


It’s the Indians bruh


people, they are being sarcastic


Literally nobody gives a fuck if you talk about horrific things that terrorist organizations do. Remove your head from your ass.


The movie showed it but is there any actual proof that it happened? . I watched the movie and scenes are surely exaggerated


Usually, these stories go viral when there is an anniversary of that black day in Kashmir. Nevertheless, I found this:[https://twitter.com/jammukashmirnow/status/1505520061393797127](https://twitter.com/jammukashmirnow/status/1505520061393797127) Mind you this article is from 2020, not 2022 when the movie was released. The movies showed all the atrocities on 1-2 families, but this wasn't the case, there were many families. Ganjoo, a telecom engineer was on his way home during the curfew relaxation period when he suspected some footsteps approaching him. He ignored it as he would have hardly expected that he was being followed by terrorists. When he reached his house, his wife, however, observed that he was being followed by some unknown men. As Ganjoo entered his house, she quickly bolted and locked the door. But the terrorists were undeterred and crashed through. Ganjoo ran up to the third floor of his house and hid in a rice bin. The terrorists checked the entire house but were unable to find him so they decided to leave as they could not locate their victim. But there were more terrorists in disguise too and fate had willed otherwise. Ganjoo's Muslim neighbors, who had seen Ganjoo hide in the bin helped the terrorists return and locate him pointing towards the container. Out they pulled him, pumped him with bullets, and left him bleeding on the rice. While leaving, the cowards shouted, "Let the rice soak in your blood and let your children eat it. Ah, what a tasty meal would it be".


The first and the last scene man... What happened with Sharda still, haunts me in the nights.


I don’t know what to say… just glad to be where I am




Let's go to Mars or something


Yo this real?






Nah she just did it for clout obviously.


These motherfuckers should be removed from earth


💀💀 true


The Quran says: **10. A husband has sex with his wife, as a plow goes into a field.** The Quran in Sura 2:223 says: *Your women are your fields, so go into your fields whichever way you like . . .* (MAS Abdel Haleem, The Qur'an, Oxford UP, 2004) The above verse implies that a husband can sexually penetrate his wife in any way or position he fancies. *'If a man invites his wife to sleep with him and she refuses to come to him, then the angels send their curses on her till morning.'* (Bukhari) **9. Husbands are a degree above their wives.** The Quran in Sura 2:228 says: *Wives have the same rights as the husbands have on them in accordance with the generally known principles. Of course, men are a degree above them in status . . .* (Sayyid Abul A'La Maududi, The Meaning of the Qur'an, vol. 1, p. 165) This hadith shows that the majority of the inhabitants of hell are women. The Prophet said, *'I looked at Paradise and found poor people forming the majority of its inhabitants; and I looked at Hell and saw that the majority of its inhabitants were women.'* **8. A male gets a double share of the inheritance over that of a female.** The Quran in Sura 4:11 says: *The share of the male shall be twice that of a female . . .* (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 311) **7. A woman's testimony counts half of a man's testimony.** The Quran in Sura 2:282 says: *And let two men from among you bear witness to all such documents \[contracts of loans without interest\]. But if two men be not available, there should be one man and two women to bear witness so that if one of the women forgets (anything), the other may remind her.* (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 205). This verse goes to the nature of womankind, and implies that a woman's mind is weak. In Sura 2:282: The Prophet said, *'Isn't the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?'* The women said, *'Yes.'* He said, *'This is because of the deficiency of a woman's mind.'* **6. A wife may remarry her ex-husband if and only if she marries another man, they have sex, and then this second man divorces her.** The Quran in Sura 2:230 says: *And if the husband divorces his wife (for the third time), she shall not remain his lawful wife after this (absolute) divorce, unless she marries another husband and the second husband divorces her. \[In that case\] there is no harm if they \[the first couple\] remarry . . . .* (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 165) This starts to make sense once you start thinking of women as nothing more than sex objects for men. The concept of *Halala* is to punish a man for wrongfully divorcing his wife by letting another man having a sexual intercourse with his wife and 'polluting' her before returning his wife back to him. Getting a used wife is meant to be a penalty for the husband so that he is more careful about divorce in the future. **5. Slave-girls are sexual property for their male owners.** The Quran in Sura 4:24 says: *And forbidden to you are wedded wives of other people except those who have fallen in your hands (as prisoners of war) . . .* (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 319). Sayyid Maududi says in his comment on the verse that is it lawful for Muslim holy warriors to marry women prisoners of war even when their husbands are still alive. But what happens if the husbands are captured with their wives? Maududi cites a school of law that says Muslims may not marry them, but two other schools say that the marriage between the captive husbands and wives is broken (note 44). But why would a debate over this cruelty emerge in the first place? No sex or marriage should take place between married female prisoners of war and their captors. In fact, no sex should take place between women captives and their Muslim overlords. But Islam traffics in injustice too often. Islam allows deep immorality with women who are in their most helpless condition. This crime is reprehensible, but Allah wills it nonetheless—the Quran says so. The hadith demonstrate that Muslim jihadists actually have sex with the captured women, whether or not they are married. In the following hadith passage, *Khumus* is one-fifth of the spoils of war. Ali, Prophet’s cousin and son-in-law, just finished a relaxing bath. Why? *The Prophet sent Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and . . . Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus).* What was Muhammad’s response to the person who hated Ali for this sexual act? *Do you hate Ali for this? . . . Don’t hate him, for he deserves more than that from \[the\] Khumus.* (Bukhari) **4. A man may be polygamous with up to four wives.** The Quran in Sura 4:3 says: *And if you be apprehensive that you will not be able to do justice to the orphans, you may marry two or three or four women whom you choose. But if you apprehend that you might not be able to do justice to them, then marry only one wife, or marry those who have fallen in your possession.* (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 305) Maududi paraphrases the verse: *'If you need more than one \[wife\] but are afraid that you might not be able to do justice to your wives from among the free people, you may turn to slave girls because in that case you will be burdened with less responsibilities'* (See Sura 4:24). **3. A husband may simply get rid of one of his undesirable wives.** The Quran in Sura 4:129 says: *It is not within your power to be perfectly equitable in your treatment with all your wives, even if you wish to be so; therefore, \[in order to satisfy the dictates of Divine Law\] do not lean towards one wife so as to leave the other in a state of suspense.* (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 381) Maududi provides an interpretation of the verse (vol. 1, pp. 383—84, note 161). He writes: *Allah made it clear that the husband cannot literally keep equality between two or more wives because they themselves cannot be equal in all respects. It is too much to demand from a husband that he should mete out equal treatment to a beautiful wife and to an ugly wife, to a young wife and to an old wife, to a healthy wife and to an invalid wife, and to a good natured wife and to an ill—natured wife. These and like things naturally make a husband more inclined towards one wife than towards the other.* This means that wives are the source of a man’s inability to treat all of them equally. One is beautiful, while another is ugly. How can Allah demand from a husband super-human strength under changing circumstances in his wives? Maududi continues: *In such cases, the Islamic law does not demand equal treatment between them in affection and love. What it does demand is that a wife should not be neglected as to be practically reduced to the position of the woman who has no husband at all. If the husband does not divorce her for any reason or at her own request, she should at least be treated as a wife. It is true that under such circumstances the husband is naturally inclined towards a favorite wife, but he should not, so to say, keep the other in such a state of suspense as if she were not his wife.* Maududi says here that the wife should not be suspended between marriage and divorce. If the husband stays with the no-longer desirable wife, then he should treat her fairly and provide for her. Where may Maududi get his idea about keeping or divorcing an unattractive wife? This article (see "the unpleasant truth behind divorce in Sura 4:130") demonstrates that Muhammad wanted to divorce one of his wives because she was overweight and old. Instead of a divorce, she gave up her "turn" in the "rotation" with the prophet, who gladly agreed with her proposal. **2. Husbands may hit their wives even if the husbands merely fear highhandedness in their wives (quite apart from whether they actually are highhanded).** The Quran in Sura 4:34 says: *If you fear highhandedness from your wives, remind them \[of the teaching of God\], then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them. If they obey you, you have no right to act against them. God is most high and great.* The hadith says that Muslim women in the time of Muhammad were suffering from domestic violence in the context of confusing marriage laws: *Rifa’a divorced his wife whereupon ‘AbdurRahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi married her. ‘Aisha said that the lady (came), wearing a green veil (and complained to her (Aisha) of her husband and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating). It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah's Apostle came, ‘Aisha said, "I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!"* (Bukhari) This hadith shows Muhammad hitting his girl-bride, Aisha, daughter of Abu Bakr, his right-hand Companion: *"He \[Muhammad\] struck me \[Aisha\] on the chest which caused me pain."* **1. Mature men are allowed to marry prepubescent girls.** The Quran in Sura 65:1, 4 says: *O Prophet, when you \[and the believers\] divorce women, divorce them for their prescribed waiting—period and count the waiting—period accurately . . . And if you are in doubt about those of your women who have despaired of menstruation, (you should know that) their waiting period is three months, and the same applies to those who have not menstruated as yet. As for pregnant women, their period ends when they have delivered their burden.* (Maududi, vol. 5, pp. 599 and 617) Divorcing prepubescent girls implies marriage to them. So the fathers of prepubescent girls may give them away, and their new husbands may consummate their marriage with them. If Islam ever spread around the world, no one should be surprised if Quran-believing Muslims lowered the marriage age of girls to nine years old. This is precisely what happened in Iran after the religious revolution of *Ayatollah Khomeini*. A girl’s marriage age was lowered to nine years. **Conclusion:** Liberals and Feminists shouldn't defend Islam.


Finally I’ve been telling people this but no one believes me


But we promise none of that is true and no real Muslim would actually follow or do those things /s


A lot of ugly words in there. Anyways enjoy it.


Whilst I agree with your statement, it's important to remember the Bible says a bunch of wild shit too.. Point being organised religion as a whole seems to just insight violence and inequality across the board, and has done since time immemorial.


Yes very true. Now do the following. Go to the most Conservative of Muslim/Christian countries and burn their religious book in public when the most people are around. Now what will typically happen to you in each country?


What Christian country do you think would react violently? Ive never seen Christians kill blasphemers of their faith in modern times.


That's my point.


Oops my bad. Were on the same side.


Absolutely! The Bible is along the same lines, just a little better than the Quran. However, we got to give credit to Christians today as they've had huge reforms and have totally turned Christianity around. Christianity and Islam were not very different back in the medieval era. Both were violently proselytic and would execute you for blasphemy or questioning their faith. Just like Islam, Christianity is responsible for wiping out entire civilizations. Today, most Christians don't follow everything that the Bible says. Abolishment of slavery and separating the Church from the State is one such instance. Unlike Muslim majority countries, almost all Christian majority countries are secular. I can criticize Christianity in a Christian majority country and come back in one piece but the same cannot be said about Muslim majority countries. Looking at terrorist organization, almost all of them are Islamic in nature. > Point being organised religion as a whole seems to just insight violence and inequality across the board, and has done since time immemorial. Indeed! There is no denying that. At the core, organized religion does have issues with mutual co-existence and freedom.


Yea, I'm not religious, but I think that a lot of criticism of religious books is kinda eh bc most people don't take the words exactly, but follow the messages taught by them. Religion can be a force for good, if it's not interpreted exactly (like some people do)


Thank you. These are the facts of misogynistic religion.


But if anyone says anything about it, then it’s “racist” or “hateful”.


Neat, now do Christianity. I promise it's worse.


Haha! I wouldn't say worse but it's certainly comparable.


Yup, all religions are shit


Not all. Just the ones that have used oppression as a tool to gain influence. And unfortunately those are the most common.


I think English translation can be taken out of context In a very bad way, I think this was put through Google translation, and not by a person, if you have any questions please tell me and I will explain it to you


I've not translated anything. The above is taken from the book *'The Meaning of Quran'* by *Maulana Abul A'la Maududi*. I've mentioned the chapters and page numbers in my parent comment.


Abul A'la Al-Maududi was an Islamic scholar, Islamist ideologue, although I respect his as Islamic scholar but not as Islamist ideologue, I think you should go to someone whose native language is Arabic like Sheikh Sharawy, he explains things better and was a very humble man, search on Google in English محمد الشعراوي and see the videos that come up and please tell me if you see any difference


You find this type of stuff or worse in every religious scriptures. Have you read the Manusmriti?


> You find this type of stuff or worse in every religious scriptures. No. Abrahamic religions aside, I've yet to see this level of violence and misogyny in religions originating from the East. > Have you read the Manusmriti? Yes, I've read the Manusmriti. Unlike Quran or the Bible, Manusmriti is not the central text in Hinduism. Hindus are free to disagree with the Manusmriti. The same cannot be said for the Quran. Moreover, Manusmriti is lost in the history. The Manusmriti we have today is only a small fraction of the original text.


Yet she would get banned speaking at university’s because it portrays Muslims in a negative light and might be too distressing like Nadia Murad.


This act, even if it was done in the name of Allah, has nothing to do with being Muslim. It has everything to do with be a disgusting human being. Any university that would ban her from speaking out about the atrocities that happen in the world based on the religion of the aggressors, is not a center for higher learning.


What are your grievances with Islam? This has nothing to do with us 1.8 billion Muslims.


The way your religion treats women like third class citizens, right behind goats, the way it treats homosexuals, the way its used to carry out terrorist attacks.


Really should have trusted the NSFW tag here. I'm upset, that poor woman.


The perpetrators who did this today live in different European cities, enjoying all the luxury our welfare system has to give


Where’s the 24 hour award when you need it


And then they will probably start doing the same shit in the European countries they live in. They can leave that area behind but they cannot leave thier mindset behind. You don't become a human after being a monster for so long.


This is something to look into. Do you have sources you could share?


Sweden didn’t become the gang r*pe capital of the world because of Scandinavian culture… [link](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45269764.amp)


Check the source! MEMRI tv? The Israeli owned media that comes off Arab/middle eastern and has extreme interviews with people who are irrelevant or have wild stories/thoughts. Fuck ISIS and religion but they would have had her son sent to another family and become a fighter in 13 years. Doubt this is in anyway true. But if I am wrong, I recant. MEMRI though, not reliable, nor true much of the time.


If this ever happened… I would kill every mf’er with my bare hands after which either kill myself or end up in a mental hospital for the rest of my life.


I feel you. I have 3 little kids. This would make me a monster. All bets off


Not all cultures are equal


Couldn't have said it better myself.


That is wrong on so many levels


Whoah this is fucked up


I wish I didn't know this...


I reckon just maybe nuke them.


There is no god, Fools


Average atheist Redditor 🤢


Not all cultures are created equal, and Islam is significantly inferior. It’s a disgusting ideology. Of course I can acknowledge that all religions are significantly flawed, but Islam is out of fucking control. Christianity, for example, definitely has its share of imperfections and fucked up followers who take things too far, but nobody can argue the fact that Jesus was, fundamentally, a good human who preached messages of love, tolerance, forgiveness, and good morals. The same cannot be said of Muhammad, however, who was by all accounts a sick, genocidal maniac and a remorseless child molesting pervert. So it’s really little wonder that his followers behave this way. The world would be FAR better off without Islam.


Yahweh literally commanded his people to commit genocide, and tear infants out of their mothers’ stomachs and dash their heads on the rocks, in addition to drowning innocent children in a worldwide flood. You’re deluded, all Abrahamic religions are barbaric


Christians always conveniently forget about God, who, according to Christianity, is also Jesus.


Hate to break it to you but the US literally funded ISIS at one point


I know they did. Add it to the long list of truly awful shit that the US has done over the years. What’s your point though?


Fucking nsfl tag for fuck sake you fuck


Redditor moment.


It’s just a tweet


You swear a lot for someone so soft…


Agreed! u/matchibex, please fix this!


I thought cannibalism is haram in Islam. ISIS is definitely not an 'Islamic state' and it's awful that they try to show Islam in a bad light like that.


Every "islamic" government creates their own vision of Islam, like, for example, that story of the 7 virgin wives in the afterlife the people were told by Bin Laden, mohammed never said that when he founded Islam, they made it entirely for their soldiers to be willing to die for them...just like the catholic church did during the crusades


MemriTV is former Israeli militairy funded pro israel Anti muslim propaganda organisation which often selective at best translates thing out of context or mistranslates stuff, I would take aything these folks say with a grain of salt they literally exist to fan hatred, that being said ISIS has done horrible things and when u dehumanizde certain groups of people , people are capable of doing a lot of horrible sh.t so theres that.




Dark web stories !!


And there’s people that support them too


Stop the planet, I'm getting off.


Religion of peace


Wow this is the absolute worst thing I have ever read on Reddit


religion of peace


Why in the actual fuck. What god would ever condone killing and serving a child as food. May they never walk in the path of allah


The Sinjar Mountain in particular was a stain on NATO and the UN. And fuck Turkey for calling the PKK terrorists when they helped save a lot of people there. I don't know if the tweet is true, but there is enough evidence that this subhuman garbage did enough to warrant letting whoever remains of those Daesh fucks die in the worst imaginable way after suffering for a long time.


Looks like Eric Cartman is working with ISIS.


Not human. Evil exists.


Where is the Muslim community speak out against there brothers & sisters who did this?


There is, but the majority of Muslim community is not on Reddit, you know who suffers the most from ISIS, yeah Muslims


Yeah i dont know if its treu what you saying, because i never heard on the news or read it on the internet, the last few years that Muslims condemn this sjit! Condemning what those Extremists are doing to people.


Reason #899769 of why Islam is fundamentally disgusting on every conceivable level and has no place in modern society.




Islam was shaped by Muhammad - a genocidal monster and remorseless child molester who preached messages of hatred, violence, intolerance, and murder since day one. So, to answer your question, yes - I think the dirty little cunt would be totally cool with this type of behaviour.


It says to season and fry them first


Guys. He’s right. We don’t have a place in this modern society of yours. It’s disgusting, and we want no part of it. Also, you do know that we wouldn’t be at this modern society of it weren’t for Muslims.


Ok, I’ll bite. How has Islam shaped the modern world?


If you're actually asking, here goes... first, the Muslim traders on the Silk Road brought paper and gunpowder to Europe from China, beginning the gunpowder age. The Muslim ottoman empire hugely advanced and preserved mathematics and architectural sciences, as well as literary techniques, firearms and artillery, and much more. Muslim libraries and scholars preserved and advanced all these technologies while in Europe the kingdoms were destroying each other, and later on Europeans only made their own tech discoveries by first learning from what the ottomans had invented. This is not just me btw, this is easily available to anyone who looks on Wikipedia or reads a Google scholar paper about Islam and it's contributions. Like it or not, Islam is not fundamentally corrupt or perverted- there just happens to be some corrupt and perverted people who claim to follow it. If you judged Christianity by the standard of Henry 8, you'd reach the same conclusions about it.




Fuck humans. You can downvotes all you want.


The jihaadis did the same evil in Kashmir too. See "The Kashmir Files" movie that recounts such real life incidents. More than 500000 Hindus were killed or exiled from Jammu and Kashmit, at gunpoint/swordpoint by Pakistani funded jihaadi terrorists, in just couple of days in January 1990.


Why the had to say “with a side of rice” 😭😭😂


Oh boy,can't wait to see the comments of people insulting Islam cuz of an ass hole of a group like isis doing sth like that


Absolutely fucking disgusting. These people are not muslims, nor should they be categorized with any group of people. these people are worse than almost all of the riminals featured on Mindhunter


r/Islam supports them btw... Try posting a post about ISIS. You will get insta banned. Not even kidding


The people who are blaming Islam and "Arab culture" are actually braindead. As if atheists christians Jews Hindus Buddhists etc etc of all cultures have not done terrible crimes against humanity. This literally is completely against Islam and has nothing to do with it the same way the persecution of the rohingyas and the starvation of India by the British had nothing do with Christianity or Buddhism


Human beings are a plague.


I did not want to read this and now I cant forget. This truly fucked with me just reading it


Religion Of Peace strikes again.


Cave people with a Islamic twist...


I think it is time to bring out the nukes.


Islam moment


And we Dutch want to bring the woman and kids back 🤢 if your mind soaked so much h8 and evil There is no place for any of them here


"I will burn this planet down before i spend another minute living among these animals" -Omni man Damn, if only he was wrong.


**To be called a Muslim, one must believe in no other God but Allah and follow his word (the Quran).** You can call yourselves a Muslim all you want but unless you do the above, you’re not a Muslim. The moment a person says that it’s valid to criticize the Quran, the word of Allah, is the moment one ceases to be a Muslim. There should be no disagreement on the fact that anyone who follows the Quran unquestionably is not fit to live in a civilized and pluralistic society because Quran preaches many such things which are illegal in a secular society. The very concept of labeling polytheists as ‘*Kafirs*’ or ‘*Mushirks*’ is offensive and discriminatory. In other words, you can’t have it both ways by saying that you believe in women empowerment & universal brotherhood and call yourselves a Muslim. Sura 2:4 - “*And who believe in that which is revealed unto thee (Muhammad) and that which was revealed before thee, and are certain of the Hereafter*”. Sura 2:5 - “*These depend on guidance from their Lord. These are the successful*”. Sura 2:6 - “*As for the Disbelievers, Whether thou warn them or thou warn them not it is all one for them; they believe not*”. Sura 2:7 - “*Allah hath sealed their hearing and their hearts, and on their eyes there is a covering. Theirs will be an awful doom*”. Sura 2:8 - “*And of mankind are some who say: We believe in Allah and the Last Day, when they believe not*”. Sura 2:9 - “*They think to beguile Allah and those who believe, and they beguile none save themselves; but they perceive not*”. Sura 2:10 - “*In their hearts is a disease, and Allah increaseth their disease. A painful doom is theirs because they lie*”. Sura 2:11 - “*And when it is said unto them: Make not mischief in the earth, they say: We are peacemakers only*”. Sura 2:12 - “*Are not they indeed the mischief-makers ? But they perceive not*”. Sura 2:13 - “*And when it is said unto them: believe as the people believe, they say: shall we believe as the foolish believe ? are not they indeed the foolish ? But they know not.*” Sura 2:14 - “*And when they fall in with those who believe, they say: We believe; but when they go apart to their devils they declare: Lo! we are with you; verily we did but mock”*. Sura 2:15 - “*Allah (Himself) doth mock them, leaving them to wander blindly on in their contumacy*”. Sura 3:85 - “*Should anyone follow a religion other than Islam, it shall never be accepted from him, and he will be among the losers in the Hereafter. As for those who reject Islam (kafārū), I will punish them with a severe punishment in the world and the Hereafter; and they will have no helpers.*” Now, I admit that every religion, Abrahamic religions in particular, has issues which need to be addressed and the religion needs to evolve via reforms. A good religion evolves with time. However, the concept of reform in Islam is unheard of because of an important reason. The Quran says the below. “*Today those who disbelieve have lost all hope of (damaging) your faith. So, do not fear them, and fear Me. Today, I have perfected your religion for you, and have completed My blessing upon you, and chosen Islam as Dīn (religion and a way of life) for you.*” There can be no reform if you consider your religion as perfect. Quran further says: Sura 9:3 - “*This is a public proclamation by Allah and His Messenger to all people on the day of the Great Pilgrimage: “Allah is free from all obligation to those who associate others with Allah in His Divinity; and so is His Messenger. If you repent, it shall be for your own good; but if you turn away, then know well that you will not be able to frustrate Allah. So give glad tidings of a painful chastisement to those who disbelieve.*” Sura 9:4 - “*Except those of the Polytheists with whom you have a treaty, and they were not deficient (in fulfilling the treaty) with you, and did not back up any one against you. So fulfill the treaty with them up to their term. Surely, Allah loves the God-fearing*”. Sura 9:5 - “*So, when the sacred months expire, kill the Polytheists wherever you find them, and catch them and besiege them and sit in ambush for them everywhere. Then, if they repent and establish Salāh and pay Zakāh, leave their way. Surely, Allah is most Forgiving, Very-Merciful*”. Many Muslims I’ve debated with, say that the above verse is said in context of self-defense or in battle because the polytheists were hostile towards the Muslims. However, ‘*kill the Mushriks wherever you find them*’ and ‘*sit in ambush for them everywhere*’ doesn’t sound like actions taken in self-defense. Moreover, it says to leave their way only if they repent and convert to Islam. It doesn’t say outright to convert to Islam but demanding the practice of *Salāh* and *Zakāh*, which are two of the pillars of Islams implies religious conversion as Muslims practice *Salāh* and *Zakāh* themselves. Sura 9:6 - “*And if any one of the Polytheists seeks your protection, give him protection until he listens to the Word of Allah, then let him reach his place of safety. That is because they are a people who do not know*”. The phrase ‘*give him protection until he listens to the Word of Allah*’ is another implication at converting to Islam. The so-called good Muslims are no longer Muslims according to the Quran as they are not obeying the word of Allah. These good Muslims will be executed under Shariat for Blasphemy. My question is why call yourselves a Muslim at all, when you’re not. If I roam in Germany with a *Hakenkreuz* painted on my forehead, I’ll be arrested even though I don’t approve of the Nazi ideology. Why affiliate with an ideology that you’ve rejected! Why take blame for a crime you never committed! When someone says that he is a Muslim, I hear that he unquestionably follows the Quran and sees me as a Kaafir. Therefore, in my opinion, the only good Muslims are ex-Muslims. The paradox of tolerance given by Karl Popper states, “*If a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually seized or destroyed by the intolerant. In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must retain the right to be intolerant of intolerance*”. This explains why secular countries shouldn’t give Islam the same level of priority as other religions because Islam, at its core, is an intolerant ideology. Giving Islam the same level of priority in a secular country will eventually turn that secular country into an Islamic theocracy. Ask yourselves how many Muslim majority countries are Secular? You need to be Islamophobic to be a decent human being. The Taliban and ISIS are following Quran as closely as one can: they kill infidels, take sex slaves and want Islam to be the only religion in the world. Everyone else is just compromising with Islam. The litmus test of whether you can trust a Muslim is his criticism of Quran and Muhammed. If a Muslim accepts Quran in its entirety, refusing to condemn even certain parts of it, I assure you that he'll do precisely what you read in the post.


First, read on Islamic rulings for slavery. Second, if a religion needs to be changed at the hands of man, then is it really from god? God knows better than any man, and he should be capable of creating the perfect religion. Now that we’ve got that out of the way, let’s start addressing your points. 2:4 to 2:15 and 3:85 I don’t see any point other than god says islam is perfect. And he will send disbelievers to hell. If you were trying to make a point, what was it? 9:6 and 9:4. Make treaties with other nonbelievers. Send apostates to their countries. That’s what 9:4 means. 9:6 is telling us if a disbeliever asks for protection give it to him until he believes. That means once he believes, he is no longer in need of protection. It is strictly forbidden to force someone to convert. As for forced Zakat, oh no I’m making you give charity I’m so evil! You also complain that there’s a word for disbeliever. Yeah, there are Arabic words for disbelievers so offensive. What else?


Nah, I'm not reading all that


Barbaric. I really have no words-I literally gasped at this Barbaric act of evil.